Project 2025, a political roadmap developed by The Heritage Foundation to guide conservative policy in the United States, draws heavily on enduring American myths that resonate deeply within the national psyche. These cultural narratives shape values and ideologies, functioning as aspirational frameworks for governance and identity.
Designed to prepare for a potential Republican administration in 2025, the roadmap is the result of collaboration among over 400 contributors from conservative think tanks and organisations. It outlines an ambitious plan to reshape the U.S. federal government, prioritising the reduction of government size, the curtailing of environmental and social regulations, the reinforcement of states’ rights, and the promotion of traditional conservative values. Central to its strategy is a proposal to strengthen executive power to swiftly enact these changes, including replacing career civil servants with politically aligned appointees.
Project 2025 exemplifies the crafting of a shared narrative—a cornerstone of modern mythology—that seeks to frame governance as a heroic battle to “restore America.” Like ancient myths that defined collective identity and purpose, it draws on recurring themes of decline, redemption, and renewal. It positions its vision as a national rescue mission, with bureaucratic elites and progressive policies cast as antagonists in a larger story of revival. This narrative taps into archetypes of heroism, villainy, and a promised utopia, creating a powerful ideological rallying point for those disenchanted by rapid social and political change.
However, as with all modern myths, this framing risks oversimplifying complex realities. By reducing governance to a binary struggle of good versus evil, it can deepen societal divisions and hinder constructive dialogue. Yet understanding how initiatives like Project 2025 leverage mythological structures is essential. These narratives are not mere political strategies; they are attempts to define a vision for society’s future. Critically examining such visions is vital to ensure they allow room for pluralism, inclusivity, and nuanced governance.